Conyers Introduces Motion to Censure ShrubCo

Raw Story has this, Censure motion introduced in House over Iraq, torture by Rep John Conyers for using lies and cherry-picked intelligence to coerce the nation into the war in Iraq.

The motion calls for the creation of a Select Committee to investigate the steps that BushCo took leading up to the attack on Iraq and removal of Saddam Hussein. The committee would also explore violations of internation law as pertaining to detainee abuse and torture of POWs (the White House's lame ass announcements to the contrary).

Good! Keep these bastards on the ropes.

In America, We Keep Our Proof in Our Pudding

As President and Commander-in-Chief, I have the constitutional responsibility and the constitutional authority to protect our country. Article II of the Constitution gives me that responsibility and the authority necessary to fulfill it. And after September the 11th, the United States Congress also granted me additional authority to use military force against al Qaeda.

So I was able to watch the president swear that he has and had the authority to order wiretaps of American citizens without court approval. This is shaping up to be a wee bit more of a boondoggle then I think he thought it would be.

He invoked Article 2 of the Constitution as the root seat of his authority. And what's article 2 got to say? Well, among other things it says...

Article 2 Section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

But I couldn't see anything in there that says a president can invoke superpowers and break the law. Stuff about appointing judges and requesting opinions of leaders but nothing that would appear to grant him any power to circumvent the rule of the Constitution just as any other citizen. Oh yeah, maybe he means this part, the stuff he actually says as he's sworn in, "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." But that's not tacit permission to break the law, not in any way at all.

It will be interesting to see who's wire was being tapped without court approval. That ought to make for an interesting day, especially if its readily obvious that the "suspects" are not terrorist suspects at all. Such as, I don't know, political opponents, business competitors to cohorts, etc.

So who was the last president who ordered wiretaps without court approval? And he didn't go on national TV and admit that he approved of them either. Not like George. Nope. You see, George's government is (ab)uses the Freedom of Information Act too. The FoIA contains this little gem, “ specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy” and “trade secrets” to “ clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” [III - Section 552 – (b) 1, 4 and 6] which is like a cheapass loophole (specifically, Executive Order 13233 that locked up Reagan and Bush Sr.s records among others ostensibly because to reveal them would weaken the nation though its eminently suggestible that the revelations in the records would be far more damaging to the current Republican power structure in this nation).

And then there's the question of the Supreme Court that would hear, eventually, this case. The newly shuffled Supreme Court with a couple of, hey crazy how this works, Bush Jr. appointees. So there's instantly a, how shall I say it, clear and substantial conflict of interests in the involved parties? Yeah, that'll work.

So there are a couple of questions that should be answered.
One, what is the constitutional legality of presidential privilege as is being invoked by Bush?
Two, who were the people being spied upon that are so important that Bush couldn't get a court's permission to spy on?
Three, is wiretapping via presidential decree an impeachable offense?
Four, can Bush fully articulate his position of how he arrived at the legality of implementing wiretaps without the benefit and review of a court?
Five, at what point is a full and complete examination, investigation and clarification of every decision the Bush presidency has made warranted in order to determine the full extent of and damage caused by presidential "privilege" as Bush interprets it?
Six, what's Fitz up to these days?
Seven, how does one impeach an entire administration?
Tags: Article 2, Constitution, wiretap, Bush, freedom of information act, executive order 13233, Republican, Nixon, Watergate, impeachment

Honor Thy Dead? How is being shipped UPS an honor?

I was catching up on my blogs this morning and read this post over at The People's Republic of Seabrook: Of course, it's only a problem when Democrats are caught doing it. The post is about dead soldiers being shipped back to the US in the cargo holds of commercial jets alongside tourist luggage.

Which is pretty thoroughly despicable but no more than I'd expect from an administration that has shown nothing but marked contempt for anyone not in their circle.

How much more upset would you be if your child was killed in Iraq and then sent home in a UPS cardboard box with a badly photo copied copy of a letter of thanks from Bush? Yeah, is it any wonder that his approval ratings are in the shitter?

Why Is This News?

This administration is so desperate for something good that they're making news about utterly ridiculous garbage like US rules out inhumane treatment of prisoners abroad. Which is, like, wow, no effing-shit, go out on a limb and no more torture of POWs abroad.

Are they kidding? This is un-news, this is spin, this is the Bush Administration trying to find something positive to glom onto because the polls are showing a relentlessly diving approval rating for Bush and his little pet war. Americans no longer believe the president though many of us have never believed this president.

Coming out against torture of POWs is about as newsworthy as saying they found out that we need air to breath to stay alive. Its garbage news.

Let's make sure the media stays focused on what is really news. The indictment of Libby, the continuing investigation into other senior White House officials, the widespread web of lies used to initiate the quagmire that is the War in Iraq, the corruption of Republican officials (DeLay anyone? Frist anyone?) and the selling of the US to corporate interests.